On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: [...] > The -oxino patches are interesting, but maybe we should leave them > brewing for another cycle. Do you agree? > Miklos, FYI, I pushed ovl-xino branch that is rebased on v4.16-rc5 and on top of a few fixes in branch ovl-fixes: * 5668064a61f6 - ovl: set i_ino to the value of st_ino for NFS export * 579515ad5c75 - ovl: opaque xattr should overrule redirect xattr * 0161362aeab7 - ovl: fix lookup with middle layer opaque dir and absolute path redirects Vivek has already written an xfstest for the middle layer opaque issue. Eddie has already tested the NFSv3 DT_UNKNOWN issue as well as the ovl-xino branch that fixes NFSv3 DT_UNKNOWN for the non samefs case. You may want to pick at least the first and third patches from ovl-fixes to v4.16. Thanks, Amir. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
