On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 10:16 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 7:44 AM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 6:02 AM, yangerkun <yangerkun@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> When there is no upper_mnt, lower multi hardlink should not construct >>> multi inode for overlay since there won't copyup. >>> >> >> This doesn't really describe a problem. >> AFAIK, the only problem has to do with fsnotify and the fix is already in >> overlayfs-next: >> 764baba80168 ovl: hash non-dir by lower inode for fsnotify >> >> Miklos, >> >> Are you planning to send a pull request soon? > > OK, I'll submit the pending patches for -rc5. > > Do you see any fixes that I missed? > No, I don't. There's Chengguang syncfs optimization, but that is not a fix, so I reccon, not rc5 material. Thanks, Amir. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
