On 2018/1/24 17:41, Amir Goldstein Wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 9:33 AM, zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi All: >> >> Here is the sixth version of test cases for the fsck.overlay[1]. > > You know, I wanted to say this earlier. > This series is a mix of 2 independent series and I don't know if > it is best for you to post them together. > > The 3 tests added to overlay/fsck group only require the minimal > helper _overlay_fsck_dirs. > > The rest of the patches really do something very different than testing > overlay.fsck itself. > > If you hadn't combined the 2 series together, the overlay/fsck series > would have completed review 2-3 revisions ago. > > I'll leave it to you to decide if to post the next revision as one series > or two, but I think it would be better if you at least re-order the > patches so that the already reviewed overlay/fsck patches > with the simple _overlay_fsck_dirs helper are before the rest of > the patches. > Sure, it's better to split into two independent series, will do. Thanks, Yi. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
