[PATCH] ovl: Improving syncfs efficiency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Currently syncfs(2) call on overlayfs just simply call sync_filesystem()
on upper_sb to synchronize whole dirty inodes in upper filesystem
regardless of the overlay ownership of the inode. It has obvious
shortcomings as below.

(1) Performance
Synchronization is probably heavy in most cases, especially when upper
filesystem is not dedicated to target overlayfs.

(2) Interference
Unplanned synchronization will probably impact IO performance of the
processes which use other overlayfs on same upper filesystem or directly
use upper filesystem.

This patch iterates overlay inodes to only sync target dirty inodes in
upper filesystem and wait on temporary waiting list to avoid waiting on
inodes that have started writeback afterwards. By doing this,
it is able to reduce cost of synchronization and will not seriously impact
IO performance of irrelative processes.

Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/overlayfs/ovl_entry.h |   4 ++
 fs/overlayfs/super.c     | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/ovl_entry.h b/fs/overlayfs/ovl_entry.h
index 9d0bc03..e92c425 100644
--- a/fs/overlayfs/ovl_entry.h
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/ovl_entry.h
@@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ struct ovl_fs {
 	/* Did we take the inuse lock? */
 	bool upperdir_locked;
 	bool workdir_locked;
+	/* ovl inode sync list lock */
+	spinlock_t  ovl_sync_list_lock;
 };
 
 /* private information held for every overlayfs dentry */
@@ -80,6 +82,8 @@ struct ovl_inode {
 
 	/* synchronize copy up and more */
 	struct mutex lock;
+	/* ovl inode sync list */
+	struct list_head sync_list;
 };
 
 static inline struct ovl_inode *OVL_I(struct inode *inode)
diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
index 76440fe..17f1406 100644
--- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
 #include <linux/statfs.h>
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
 #include <linux/posix_acl_xattr.h>
+#include <linux/writeback.h>
+#include <linux/blkdev.h>
 #include "overlayfs.h"
 
 MODULE_AUTHOR("Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>");
@@ -195,6 +197,7 @@ static struct inode *ovl_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
 	oi->__upperdentry = NULL;
 	oi->lower = NULL;
 	mutex_init(&oi->lock);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&oi->sync_list);
 
 	return &oi->vfs_inode;
 }
@@ -252,6 +255,96 @@ static void ovl_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
 	ovl_free_fs(ofs);
 }
 
+/**
+ * ovl_sync_filesystem
+ * @sb: The overlayfs super block
+ *
+ * Sync underlying dirty inodes in upper filesystem and wait for completion.
+ * Use temporary wait list to avoid waiting on inodes that have started
+ * writeback after this point.
+ */
+static int ovl_sync_filesystem(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+	struct ovl_fs *ofs = sb->s_fs_info;
+	struct super_block *upper_sb = ofs->upper_mnt->mnt_sb;
+	struct ovl_inode *oi, *oi_next;
+	struct inode *inode, *i_next;
+	struct inode *upper_inode;
+	struct blk_plug plug;
+	LIST_HEAD(ovl_sync_list);
+
+	struct writeback_control wbc = {
+		.sync_mode		= WB_SYNC_ALL,
+		.for_sync		= 1,
+		.range_start		= 0,
+		.range_end		= LLONG_MAX,
+		.nr_to_write		= LONG_MAX,
+	};
+
+	blk_start_plug(&plug);
+	spin_lock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(inode, i_next, &sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
+		upper_inode = ovl_inode_upper(inode);
+		if (!upper_inode)
+			continue;
+
+		spin_lock(&upper_inode->i_lock);
+		if (upper_inode->i_state & (I_NEW | I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE) ||
+			list_empty(&upper_inode->i_io_list)) {
+			spin_unlock(&upper_inode->i_lock);
+			continue;
+		}
+		spin_unlock(&upper_inode->i_lock);
+
+		if (!igrab(inode))
+			continue;
+
+		if (!igrab(upper_inode)) {
+			iput(inode);
+			continue;
+		}
+		spin_unlock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
+
+		sync_inode(upper_inode, &wbc);
+		spin_lock(&ofs->ovl_sync_list_lock);
+		if (list_empty(&OVL_I(inode)->sync_list))
+			list_add(&OVL_I(inode)->sync_list, &ovl_sync_list);
+		else {
+			iput(upper_inode);
+			iput(inode);
+		}
+		spin_unlock(&ofs->ovl_sync_list_lock);
+
+		if (need_resched()) {
+			blk_finish_plug(&plug);
+			cond_resched();
+			blk_start_plug(&plug);
+		}
+		spin_lock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
+	blk_finish_plug(&plug);
+
+	mutex_lock(&upper_sb->s_sync_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(oi, oi_next, &ovl_sync_list, sync_list) {
+		upper_inode = ovl_inode_upper(&oi->vfs_inode);
+
+		filemap_fdatawait_keep_errors(upper_inode->i_mapping);
+		list_del_init(&oi->sync_list);
+		iput(upper_inode);
+		iput(&oi->vfs_inode);
+
+		if (need_resched())
+			cond_resched();
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&upper_sb->s_sync_lock);
+
+	if (upper_sb->s_op->sync_fs)
+		upper_sb->s_op->sync_fs(upper_sb, 1);
+
+	return sync_blockdev(upper_sb->s_bdev);
+}
+
 /* Sync real dirty inodes in upper filesystem (if it exists) */
 static int ovl_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
 {
@@ -266,8 +359,8 @@ static int ovl_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
 	 * If this is a sync(2) call or an emergency sync, all the super blocks
 	 * will be iterated, including upper_sb, so no need to do anything.
 	 *
-	 * If this is a syncfs(2) call, then we do need to call
-	 * sync_filesystem() on upper_sb, but enough if we do it when being
+	 * If this is a syncfs(2) call, then we do need to call sync_inode()
+	 * on underlying dirty upper_inode, but enough if we do it when being
 	 * called with wait == 1.
 	 */
 	if (!wait)
@@ -276,7 +369,7 @@ static int ovl_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
 	upper_sb = ofs->upper_mnt->mnt_sb;
 
 	down_read(&upper_sb->s_umount);
-	ret = sync_filesystem(upper_sb);
+	ret = ovl_sync_filesystem(sb);
 	up_read(&upper_sb->s_umount);
 
 	return ret;
@@ -1206,6 +1299,8 @@ static int ovl_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
 	if (!cred)
 		goto out_err;
 
+	spin_lock_init(&ofs->ovl_sync_list_lock);
+
 	ofs->config.index = ovl_index_def;
 	err = ovl_parse_opt((char *) data, &ofs->config);
 	if (err)
-- 
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux