Re: [PATCH v2 02/23] ovl: ignore index mount option when no upper layer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 8:42 PM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 06:39:57PM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>> For non-upper overlay mount, the value of index mount option is moot.
>> When mounter tries to set this mount options, emit a warning and leave
>> the value at the default so it won't show up in /proc/mounts.
>
> I am curious, what should show in /proc/mounts. Current code seems to
> print this only if it is different from default.
>

I guess that is a common pattern for filesystems only show options
that are different from default.

I think the logic is that one would try to reconstruct mounts from a
snapshot of /proc/mounts, there is no reason to specify values that
are default, because resulting mount will be the same.

> So if detfault is index=on, and user specifies index=off (with no upper),
> it should still show in /proc/mounts?
>

What this patch says is that index is not a relevant option with no upper,
so basically specifying either index=on/off is wrong, but so does specifying
workdir and the action that overlay takes is ignoring the wrong option.
I realize the setting index to default (on) when there is no upper is
a bit hacky, but I think we can live with that in order to keep the parsing
code simple and storing only a boolean single state.

Amir.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux