Re: [PATCH 04/11] ovl: Provide a mount option metacopy=on/off for metadata copyup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 07:31:51AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:05 AM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > By default metadata only copy up is disabled. Provide a mount option so
>> > that users can choose one way or other.
>> >
>> > Also provide a kernel config and module option to enable/disable
>> > metacopy feature.
>> >
>> > Like index feature, when overlay is mounted, on root upper directory we
>> > set ORIGIN which points to lower. And at later mount time it is verified
>> > again. This hopes to get the configuration right. But this does only so
>> > much as we don't verify all the lowers. So it is possible that a lower is
>> > missing and later data copy up fails.
>>
>> Like index feature, please error mount if ovl_inuse_trylock fails.
>> As you know, this error is only conditional because of backward
>> compatibility, so any new opt-in feature should enforce it.
>
> Hi Amir,
>
> I am not so sure about it. Avoiding leaking any mount point is really
> really hard. And I don't think current container runtime have been
> modified to make it fool proof.
>
> IMHO, if we really want to enforce something like this, then we need
> to have some sort of capability to find existing superblock and reuse it.
> (Something like what happens with block devices).
>

That sounds like a good idea. Any chance you can make it happen?
Keep in mind that would be a change of behavior, so users will have to
opt-in for it as well.

> I am afraid that if I start enforcing this, then this feature will not
> be used at all because software has not been hardended enough to avoid
> mount point leaks completely.
>

I find that approach a bit dodgy.
If not for enjoying new overlayfs feature, why would container runtime
developers ever bother to fix mount leaks.

Anyway, that is up to Miklos to decide.

Amir.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux