Re: [PATCH 0/2] overlay: fix INDEX=y regressions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 02:39:42PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> Eryu,
> 
> When you added the comment to overlay/014, I said Looks good to me,
> but I wasn't looking well.
> Second patch is the same treatment to overlay/031 (with the correct
> comment).
> 
> Test overlay/031 does not pass on master, but with INDEX=y, it fails
> on the wrong errors.
> The test passes on my development branch:
> https://github.com/amir73il/linux/commits/overlayfs-devel

Thanks for all the fixes and clarifications! Queued for next update.

Eryu

> 
> Amir.
> 
> Amir Goldstein (2):
>   overlay/014: correct comment relating to workdir reuse
>   overlay/031: fix test with inodes index enabled
> 
>  tests/overlay/014 |  7 +++----
>  tests/overlay/031 | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux