On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Add a separate flags argument (in addition to the open flags) to control
> the behavior of d_real().
>
> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
...
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
>
> static struct dentry *ovl_d_real(struct dentry *dentry,
> const struct inode *inode,
> - unsigned int open_flags)
> + unsigned int open_flags, unsigned int flags)
> {
> struct dentry *real;
> int err;
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static struct dentry *ovl_d_real(struct dentry *dentry,
> goto bug;
>
> /* Handle recursion */
> - real = d_real(real, inode, open_flags);
> + real = d_real(real, inode, open_flags, 0);
>
Shouldn't recursion pass on flags?
The answer is probably per flag.
The 2 currently proposed flags don't end up in recursion anyway,
although it is arguable that D_REAL_ALL should end up in recursion
because according to comment it should behave the same as
d_real for regular files.
For the purpose for which D_REAL_ALL was proposed (atime update)
the recursion case doesn't really matter.
Maybe a flag D_REAL_NORECURSE and then for
update_ovl_inode_times() use D_REAL_ALL|D_REAL_NORECURSE
Alternatively, update_ovl_inode_times() could use D_REAL_UPPER
and then we explicitly say that we don't care about lower mtime/ctime
modifications.
Amir.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
