On 2017/6/28 21:17, Amir Goldstein Wrote: > Miklos, > > Not that I have not given you enough work with inode index patches, > but just so you know, I have a tested branch [1] based on ovl-hardlinks > with a merge of 3 topic branches: > 1. Non-samefs constant inode (Chandan & Amir) > 2. Verify & set merge dir origin on lookup (Amir) > 3. Check whiteouts in origin dir (Zhangyi & Amir) > > The 3 topic branches are completely independent and merge > with no conflicts, so if you choose to, you may pick any one of > them for v4.13. > > The patches from Chandan and Zhangyi have gone through several > review cycles and I complemented each with a patch on my own. > Not sure if you had a chance to glimpse. > > Tested with a new xfstests whiteout test by Zhangyi [2] and > new unionmount-testsuite run flag [3] to check constant inode on > non-samefs (./run --ov --verify). > > Zhangyi, > > One thing I have not tested, but that should work is hiding of > whiteouts in a merge dir that was created prior to v4.12. > The test should be: > - Create merge dir and whiteouts with kernel <= v4.12-rc* > - Upgrade to kernel built from overlayfs-devel > - Mount overlay and list merge dir (should fix origin) > - Continue with use case of removing lower dir > and trying to expose whiteouts > > If you can spare the time, please test this use case. Hi Amir, I tested this use case, it works well. Thanks. Thanks, ZhangYi. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
