Re: [RFC PATCH V2] ovl:fix rmdir problem on impure dir

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 1:19 PM, zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2017/6/19 16:28, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 6:00 AM, zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> I still don't like adding the impure flag because of a whiteout.
>>> Impure dir means it contains a copied up object.  In fact a valid (but
>>> probably not worthwhile) optimizition would be to remove the impure
>>> flag on removal of the last copied up object.
>>>
>>> What's wrong with testing for (origin || merge) to see if we need to
>>> check for whiteouts?
>>>
>>
>> Fine by me.
>>
>> Yi,
>>
>> Please note that you cannot use the test OVL_TYPE_ORIGIN(type)
>> in ovl_dir_is_real(), because that flag is only set when the lower
>> dentry is found by lookup. Instead, you should explicitly check for
>> existence of OVL_XATTR_ORIGIN.
>> Note that even ovl_get_origin_fh() is too strict, because it discards
>> empty (unkown) origin, but for your use case, unknown origin is also
>> candidate to contain whiteouts.
>>
>
> I realize that impure flag is not quite suitable. If we use (origin || merge)
> to see whether we need to check whiteouts or not, I think we still have a
> problem.
>
> Thought: In my current test case, testdir was copyuped when we delete
> the test file, so it have OVL_XATTR_ORIGIN (it's OK), but if the testdir
> is a merged dir originally, it will not be copied up and the OVL_XATTR_ORIGIN
> will not be set.
>
> So, if we want to use (origin || merge), we have to set OVL_XATTR_ORIGIN for
> the merged parent dir when it create whiteout, any side effects?

It's done for the root of the overlay by Amir's patchset, but that
probably should be done generically for all merged directories not
already having an origin marking.   It could be done at lookup time,
or at whiteout time.  Not sure which is better.

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux