On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Bad things can happen if several concurrent overlay mounts try to
> use the same upperdir path and/or workdir path.
>
> Try to get the 'inuse' advisory lock on upper and work dir.
> Fail mount if another overlay mount instance or another user
> holds the 'inuse' lock.
>
> Note that this provides no protection for concurrent overlay
> mount that use overlapping (i.e. descendant) upper dirs or
> work dirs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/overlayfs/super.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> index 4882ffb..ac9212d 100644
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> @@ -165,12 +165,42 @@ static const struct dentry_operations ovl_reval_dentry_operations = {
> .d_weak_revalidate = ovl_dentry_weak_revalidate,
> };
>
> +/* Get exclusive ownership on upper/work dir among overlay mounts */
> +static bool ovl_dir_lock(struct dentry *dentry)
> +{
> + struct inode *inode;
> +
> + if (!dentry)
> + return false;
> +
> + inode = d_inode(dentry);
> + if (!inode || inode_inuse(inode))
> + return false;
> +
> + return inode_inuse_trylock(inode);
> +}
> +
> +static void ovl_dir_unlock(struct dentry *dentry)
> +{
> + struct inode *inode;
> +
> + if (!dentry)
> + return;
> +
> + inode = d_inode(dentry);
> + if (inode && inode_inuse(inode))
> + inode_inuse_unlock(inode);
> +}
Seems a bit overcomplicated. Aren't we always dealing with positive
dentries? In which case these can just be trivial wrappers around
inode_inuse_{try|un}lock(), or can be gotten rid of completely.
> +
> static void ovl_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
> {
> struct ovl_fs *ufs = sb->s_fs_info;
> unsigned i;
>
> + ovl_dir_unlock(ufs->workdir);
> dput(ufs->workdir);
> + if (ufs->upper_mnt)
> + ovl_dir_unlock(ufs->upper_mnt->mnt_root);
> mntput(ufs->upper_mnt);
> for (i = 0; i < ufs->numlower; i++)
> mntput(ufs->lower_mnt[i]);
> @@ -407,6 +437,14 @@ static struct dentry *ovl_workdir_create(struct vfsmount *mnt,
> if (retried)
> goto out_dput;
>
> + /*
> + * We have parent i_mutex, so this test is race free
> + * w.r.t. ovl_dir_lock() below by another overlay mount.
> + */
> + err = -EBUSY;
> + if (inode_inuse(work->d_inode))
> + goto out_dput;
> +
Why not lock it here?
> retried = true;
> ovl_workdir_cleanup(dir, mnt, work, 0);
> dput(work);
> @@ -446,6 +484,14 @@ static struct dentry *ovl_workdir_create(struct vfsmount *mnt,
> inode_unlock(work->d_inode);
> if (err)
> goto out_dput;
> +
> + /*
> + * Protect our work dir from being deleted/renamed and from
> + * being reused by another overlay mount.
> + */
> + err = -EBUSY;
> + if (!ovl_dir_lock(work))
> + goto out_dput;
> }
> out_unlock:
> inode_unlock(dir);
> @@ -849,6 +895,16 @@ static int ovl_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> pr_err("overlayfs: failed to clone upperpath\n");
> goto out_put_lowerpath;
> }
> + /*
> + * Protect our upper dir from being deleted/renamed and from
> + * being reused by another overlay mount.
> + */
> + err = -EBUSY;
> + if (!ovl_dir_lock(upperpath.dentry)) {
> + pr_err("overlayfs: upperdir in-use by another overlay mount?\n");
> + goto out_put_upper_mnt;
> + }
> +
> /* Don't inherit atime flags */
> ufs->upper_mnt->mnt_flags &= ~(MNT_NOATIME | MNT_NODIRATIME | MNT_RELATIME);
>
> @@ -857,6 +913,10 @@ static int ovl_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> ufs->workdir = ovl_workdir_create(ufs->upper_mnt, workpath.dentry);
> err = PTR_ERR(ufs->workdir);
> if (IS_ERR(ufs->workdir)) {
> + if (err == -EBUSY) {
> + pr_err("overlayfs: workdir in-use by another overlay mount?\n");
Why ask? Aren't we sure?
> + goto out_unlock_upperdir;
> + }
> pr_warn("overlayfs: failed to create directory %s/%s (errno: %i); mounting read-only\n",
> ufs->config.workdir, OVL_WORKDIR_NAME, -err);
> sb->s_flags |= MS_RDONLY;
> @@ -874,7 +934,7 @@ static int ovl_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
>
> err = ovl_check_d_type_supported(&workpath);
> if (err < 0)
> - goto out_put_workdir;
> + goto out_unlock_workdir;
>
> /*
> * We allowed this configuration and don't want to
> @@ -910,7 +970,7 @@ static int ovl_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> err = -ENOMEM;
> ufs->lower_mnt = kcalloc(numlower, sizeof(struct vfsmount *), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (ufs->lower_mnt == NULL)
> - goto out_put_workdir;
> + goto out_unlock_workdir;
> for (i = 0; i < numlower; i++) {
> struct vfsmount *mnt = clone_private_mount(&stack[i]);
>
> @@ -1002,8 +1062,12 @@ static int ovl_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> for (i = 0; i < ufs->numlower; i++)
> mntput(ufs->lower_mnt[i]);
> kfree(ufs->lower_mnt);
> -out_put_workdir:
> +out_unlock_workdir:
> + ovl_dir_unlock(ufs->workdir);
> dput(ufs->workdir);
> +out_unlock_upperdir:
> + ovl_dir_unlock(upperpath.dentry);
> +out_put_upper_mnt:
> mntput(ufs->upper_mnt);
> out_put_lowerpath:
> for (i = 0; i < numlower; i++)
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
