On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 04:57:51PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > I did consider defining uuid_t as uuid_be. > most of the patch set would have remained the same and > xfs_uuid_getnodeuniq() would use struct uuid_v1 explicitly > instead of implicitly. At least don't add new users of uuid_v1. Moving that stuff into uuid.[ch] was a major mistake, and I wish review would have caught it back then. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
