On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If you do like the idea, let me know if you want me to send a patch on > top of v5. > > Do you plan to push v5 (+ "else if" bugfix) to overlayfs-next? > > If we go for my solution to endianess, we can add that patch > as a fix patch (same goes for null uuid). I don't think doing the checks once per mount gets us much. Bytes are cheap, checks are cheap, why add complexity? Pushed .v6 with these fixes. Takes care of future fixes to file handle byte order by allowing CPU independent byte order as well. I'd like to push to overlayfs-next if it appears to work and passes tests. Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
