Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] ovl: store file handle of lower inode on copy up

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> The offset argument is discard-able, it gives you more information
> than we need.

Sure, the problem with that is what should a filesystem put there
which cannot provide such an offset?   Is it optional?  What value
indicates invalid offset?

> Another problem is that ->get_uuid for xfs is compiled out by default
> without CONFIG_PNFSD, although this could be changed.
>
> Anyway, I have a very simple patch for xfs to set sb->s_uuid.
> btrfs has several uuid's (i.e. subvolumes) on the same sb struct IIUC,
> so need to see how to handle this.

Yes, actually btrfs wants some sort of lightweight superblock for
subvolumes with just s_dev and s_uuid.

Not sure what we can do about that for now...

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux