Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] fstests: add generic test for file handles

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Eryu Guan <eguan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 07:29:19PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>> Cloned from xfs specific test xfs/238, which checks
>> stale file handles of deleted files.
>>
>> This test uses the generic open_by_handle_at() syscall
>> and also tests for non-stale file handles of linked files.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  tests/generic/426     | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  tests/generic/426.out |  2 ++
>>  tests/generic/group   |  1 +
>>  3 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100755 tests/generic/426
>>  create mode 100644 tests/generic/426.out
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/generic/426 b/tests/generic/426
>> new file mode 100755
>> index 0000000..c39c165
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/generic/426
>> @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
>> +#! /bin/bash
>> +# FS QA Test No. 426
>> +#
>> +# Check stale handles pointing to unlinked files
>> +# and non-stale handles pointing to linked files
>> +#
>> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> +# Copyright (C) 2017 CTERA Networks. All Rights Reserved.
>> +# Author: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
>> +#
>> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>> +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
>> +# published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> +#
>> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
>> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
>> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
>> +#
>> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation,
>> +# Inc.,  51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA  02110-1301  USA
>> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> +#
>> +
>> +seq=`basename $0`
>> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
>> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
>> +
>> +here=`pwd`
>> +tmp=/tmp/$$
>> +status=1     # failure is the default!
>> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
>> +
>> +_cleanup()
>> +{
>> +    cd /
>> +    rm -f $tmp.*
>> +}
>> +
>> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
>> +. ./common/rc
>> +. ./common/filter
>> +
>> +# real QA test starts here
>> +
>> +# Modify as appropriate.
>> +_supported_fs generic
>> +_supported_os Linux
>> +# _require_exportfs already requires open_by_handle, but let's not count on it
>> +_require_test_program "open_by_handle"
>> +_require_exportfs
>> +
>> +numfiles=1024
>> +testdir=$TEST_DIR/$seq-dir
>> +mkdir -p $testdir
>> +
>> +# Check stale handles to deleted files
>> +rm -f $testdir/*
>> +src/open_by_handle -c $testdir $numfiles
>> +src/open_by_handle -d $testdir $numfiles
>> +
>> +# Check non-stale handles to linked files
>> +rm -f $testdir/*
>> +src/open_by_handle -c $testdir $numfiles
>> +src/open_by_handle    $testdir $numfiles
>> +
>> +# Check non-stale handles to files that were hardlinked and original deleted
>> +src/open_by_handle -l $testdir $numfiles
>> +src/open_by_handle -u $testdir $numfiles
>
> This last test still depends on test files created in the second test
> implicitly. Forgot to update this part?

Intentional.
It's the intended usage to create a test set with -c
(imagine this is going to done on lower layer)
then link the test set with -l (imagine this on either lower or overlay)
then unlink the test set with -u (imagine this on overlay).

So as a rule of thumb, rm -f is only added as extra safety
before a src/open_by_handle -c line

>
> # Check non-stale handles to files that were hardlinked and original deleted
> rm -f $testdir/*
> src/open_by_handle -c $testdir $numfiles
> src/open_by_handle -l $testdir $numfiles
> src/open_by_handle -u $testdir $numfiles
>
>> +
>> +echo "Silence is golden"
>> +status=$?
>
> $? is always 0 after echo. And any test failure could break golden
> image, I think status can be set to 0 unconditionally.
>

Indeed. a combination of copy&paste from xfs/238 and me moving
Silence is golden to end. Let me know if you want me to re-post for this
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux