On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 01:07:47PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: ... > > So how about remove all the files and call "open_by_handle -c ..." > > before each test? e.g. (I use testdir and don't remove lost+found dir > > because extN needs it for fsck) > > > > Sure. Makes sense. > Going forward, as you might have guessed, I am going to add > _scratch_cycle_mount to the mix. > > > > testdir=$SCRATCH_MNT/testdir > > So I copied using SCRATCH_MNT from xfs/238, but I wonder if > I should go with thsi instead: > testdir=$TEST_DIR/$seq > > Maybe some fs is vulnerable to exporting handles from an ages fs > who knows... Any opinion? Hmm, I have no strong preference on this, seems TEST_DIR should be sufficient for the test and we can get rid of one test requirement. Thanks, Eryu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
