On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, but do you think we should delay consistent_fd until we have a full > solution for constant_ino? > Do you think it is acceptable to fix only stat (to return lower ino) and leave > readdir d_ino for later? I don't know, because, as we discussed previously, these are really luxury bugs, and there's no push for either from real use cases. So I'd add fixes in the order of becoming the obviously right fix. I think we are closer to getting the constant ino resolved properly than consistent fd. I really want to look into sharing pages between clones. "Unfortunately" I'll be taking next week off, so... Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
