Re: Question about ovl_dentry_weird

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:48 AM, zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi:
> Current overlayfs does not support underlying filesystem which have "weird" d_flags (like DCACHE_OP_HASH,
> DCACHE_OP_COMPARE, DCACHE_OP_REVALIDATE, etc). So we cannot support fs have it's own d_hash, d_compare and
> d_revalidate functions.

Not accurate. d_revalidate() is allowed for lower, but not for upper
(ovl_dentry_remote()).

I can't say I understand why upper is not allowed to be remote, so this might
be fixed if there is a need and there is a tester.

>
> Do you have a TODO plan to support it in a future version ?
>

Which of the constrains is relevant to your use case? (which of the flags)
Do you need it for lower / upper or both?
Is it a proprietary file system of a known one you need to support?

Thanks,
Amir.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux