[re-sending with correct address of fstests list] On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> I've uploaded a new kvm-xfstests image at: >> >> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/kvm-xfstests >> >> This has the latest xfstests, xfsprogs, and e2fsprogs update, as well >> as changes to help debug problems in the journal_lazy patches: >> >> e2fsprogs v1.43.4-27-g686994eb (Fri, 3 Mar 2017 10:02:14 -0500) >> fio fio-2.17-1-g54441e7 (Wed, 18 Jan 2017 08:18:28 -0700) >> quota e0b6335 (Thu, 9 Feb 2017 11:55:45 +0100) >> stress-ng 4ad62e1 (Mon, 27 Feb 2017 14:28:36 -0500) >> xfsprogs v4.10.0-rc1 (Wed, 15 Feb 2017 21:48:31 -0600) >> xfstests-bld 032c8c3 (Fri, 3 Mar 2017 21:03:05 -0500) >> xfstests linux-v3.8-1414-g999e3f6 (Sun, 5 Mar 2017 19:11:35 -0500) > > Ted, > > That is not an xfstests commit (is it??) > > The reason I am asking is because I want to change kvm-xfstests > overlay cfg scripts to use the new xfstests overlay config. e.g.:: > > SIZE=large > export TEST_DEV=$LG_TST_DEV > export TEST_DIR=$LG_TST_MNT > export SCRATCH_DEV=$LG_SCR_DEV > export SCRATCH_MNT=$LG_SCR_MNT > > The benefit of this setup is (quoting myself) "to help catch overlayfs bugs > related to leaking objects in underlying (base) fs", because with this > setup, base fs is cycle mounted after every test. > > This change requires xfstests commit > 33e4199 ("overlay: use OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_MNT instead of SCRATCH_DEV") > > Currently, xfstests-bld default config file does not even include a > default value > for XFSTESTS_COMMIT. > > Should I just go on and send you a patch and let you (and other > xfstests-bld users) > worry about using a recent enough version of xfstests? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
