On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Eryu Guan <eguan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 10:43:41PM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>> Instead of setting the vars TEST/SCRATCH_DEV to overlay base dirs,
>> allow setting them to block devices to configure the base fs partition,
>> where overlay dirs will be created.
>>
>> For example, the following config file can be used to run tests on
>> xfs test/scratch partitions:
>>
>> TEST_DEV=/dev/sda5
>> TEST_DIR=/mnt/test
>> SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/sda6
>> SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/scratch
>> FSTYP=xfs
>>
>> Using the same config file, but executing './check -overlay' will
>> use the same partitions as base fs for overlayfs directories
>> and set TEST_DIR/SCRATCH_MNT values to overlay mount points, i.e.:
>> /mnt/test/ovl-mnt and /mnt/scratch/ovl-mnt.
>>
>> The base fs should be pre-formatted and mounted when starting the test.
>> An upcoming change is going to support mount/umount of base fs.
>>
>> The new OVL_BASE_SCRATCH/TEST_* vars are set to point at the
>> overlayfs base dirs in either legacy or new config method.
>> Tests should always use these vars and not the legacy SCRATCH/TEST_DEV
>> vars when referring to overlay base dir.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
...
>>
>> # Parse config section options. This function will parse all the configuration
>> @@ -516,6 +574,15 @@ get_next_config() {
>> unset SCRATCH_DEV
>> fi
>>
>> + # We might have overriden TEST/SCRATCH vars with overlay base dir in the
>> + # previous run, so restore them to original values stored in OVL_BASE_*
>> + if [ "$FSTYP" == "overlay" ]; then
>> + [ -z "$OVL_BASE_TEST_DEV" ] || export TEST_DEV=$OVL_BASE_TEST_DEV
>> + [ -z "$OVL_BASE_TEST_DIR" ] || export TEST_DIR=$OVL_BASE_TEST_DIR
>> + [ -z "$OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_DEV" ] || export SCRATCH_DEV=$OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_DEV
>> + [ -z "$OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_MNT" ] || export SCRATCH_MNT=$OVL_BASE_SCRATCH_MNT
>> + fi
>> +
>> parse_config_section $1
>>
>> if [ ! -z "$OLD_FSTYP" ] && [ $OLD_FSTYP != $FSTYP ]; then
>> @@ -544,6 +611,12 @@ get_next_config() {
>> export RESULT_BASE="$here/results/"
>> fi
>>
>> + # Override FSTYP from config when running ./check -overlay
>> + # and maybe derive overlay TEST/SCRATCH from base fs values
>> + if [ "$OVERLAY" == "true" -o "$FSTYP" == "overlay" ]; then
>> + _config_overlay
>> + fi
>> +
>
> If I have SCRATCH_DEV_POOL defined, e.g.
>
> TEST_DEV=/dev/sda5
> TEST_DIR=/mnt/testarea/test
> SCRATCH_DEV_POOL="/dev/sda6 /dev/sda7"
> SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/testarea/scratch
>
> I got error like:
>
> [root@dhcp-66-86-11 xfstests]# ./check -overlay overlay/002
> common/config: SCRATCH_DEV (/dev/sda6) is not a directory for overlay
>
> Because we obtain SCRATCH_DEV from SCRATCH_DEV_POOL after we call
> _config_overlay, and SCRATCH_DEV is not set when configing overlay, so
> SCRATCH_DEV stays as a block device and fails _check_device.
>
> Moving the SCRATCH_DEV_POOL handling just after "unset SCRATCH_DEV"
> fixes this problem for me.
>
Right, I didn't test this setup. It appears to me that SCRATCH_DEV_POOL handling
should be *after* parse_config_section for multi section config, where
SCRATCH_DEV_POOL is assigned a new value in current section??
Can you check if SCRATCH_DEV_POOL handling could be moved right before
_config_overlay?
I'm not really sure how that configuration should be working with
overlay anyway.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
