Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] overlay: mount/unmount base fs before/after running tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 10:43:44PM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> When TEST/SCRATCH_DEV are configured to the base fs block device,
> use this information to mount base fs before running tests,
> unmount it after running tests and cycle on _test_cycle_mount
> along with the overlay mounts.
> 
> This helps catching overlayfs bugs related to leaking objects in
> underlying (base) fs.
> 
> To preserve expected tests behavior, the semantics are:
> - _scratch_mkfs mounts the base fs, cleans all files, creates
>   lower/upper dirs and keeps base fs mounted
> - _scratch_mount mounts base fs (if needed) and mounts overlay
> - _scratch_unmount unmounts overlay and base fs
> 
> Tests that use _scratch_unmount to unmount a custom overlay mount
> and expect to have access to overlay base dir, were fixed to use
> explicit umount $SCRATCH_MNT instead.
> 
> The overlay test itself, does not support formatting the base fs.
> However, it is possible to add overlay sections to a multi section
> config file after every base fs configuration, to run the overlay
> tests with the file system that was created on the test partitions
> in the previous section (see example in README.config-sections).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  README.config-sections |  6 ++++++
>  common/rc              | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  tests/overlay/003      |  3 ++-
>  tests/overlay/004      |  3 ++-
>  tests/overlay/014      |  5 +++--
>  5 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/README.config-sections b/README.config-sections
> index df7c929..d45d6da 100644
> --- a/README.config-sections
> +++ b/README.config-sections
> @@ -102,6 +102,9 @@ MKFS_OPTIONS="-q -F -b4096"
>  FSTYP=ext4
>  RESULT_BASE="`pwd`/results/`date +%d%m%y_%H%M%S`"
>  
> +[ext4_overlay]
> +FSTYP=overlay
> +
>  [ext4_1k_block_size]
>  MKFS_OPTIONS="-q -F -b1024"
>  
> @@ -112,6 +115,9 @@ MKFS_OPTIONS="-q -F -b4096 -O ^has_journal"
>  MKFS_OPTIONS="-f"
>  FSTYP=xfs
>  
> +[xfs_overlay]
> +FSTYP=overlay
> +
>  [ext3_filesystem]
>  FSTYP=ext3
>  MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o noatime"
> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> index 74168ea..e9ac0df 100644
> --- a/common/rc
> +++ b/common/rc
> @@ -328,24 +328,70 @@ _overlay_mount()
>  			    $SELINUX_MOUNT_OPTIONS $* $dir $mnt
>  }
>  
> +_overlay_base_test_mount()
> +{
> +	if [ -z "$OVL_BASE_TEST_DEV" -o -z "$OVL_BASE_TEST_DIR" ] || \
> +		_check_mounted_on OVL_BASE_TEST_DEV $OVL_BASE_TEST_DEV \
> +				OVL_BASE_TEST_DIR $OVL_BASE_TEST_DIR
> +	then
> +		return 0
> +	fi
> +
> +	_mount $OVL_BASE_MOUNT_OPTIONS \

OVL_BASE_MOUNT_OPTIONS is from MOUNT_OPTIONS, which is used for scratch
mount. Do we need a ovl base counter part of TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS?

Thanks,
Eryu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux