On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:21:48AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Eryu Guan <eguan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:45:06AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote: > >> Introduce a new test to demonstrate a known issue with overlayfs: > >> - stat file A shows inode number X > >> - modify A to trigger copy up > >> - stat file A shows inode number Y != X > >> > >> Also test if d_ino of readdir entries changes after copy up. > >> > >> There is a POC patch by Miklos Szeredi that fixes this issue. > >> > >> Not dealing with hardlinks here, because there is more to test > >> then stable inode number. > >> Hardlinks will get a test of their own. > > > > Thanks! I added the missing SOB line, and added "copyup" group too. > > > > Right. Thanks. > I audited existing tests and I believe my 016 also calls for "copyup" tag > and 013 as well. > Do you want a patch for that or will you fix it up yourself? Please send a new patch to fix them. Thanks! Eryu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
