On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> + /* >> + * These should be intercepted, but they are very unlikely to be >> + * a problem in practice. Leave them alone for now. > > It could also be handled in vfs helpers. > Since these ops all start with establishing that src and dest are on > the same sb, > then the cost of copy up of src is the cost of clone_file_range from > lower to upper, > so it is probably worth to copy up src and leave those fops alone. > >> + */ >> + ofop->fops.copy_file_range = orig->copy_file_range; >> + ofop->fops.clone_file_range = orig->clone_file_range; >> + ofop->fops.dedupe_file_range = orig->dedupe_file_range; Not sure I understand. Why should we copy up src? Copy up is the problem not the solution. Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
