On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 09:12:13PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:33 PM, Darrick J. Wong > <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 09:52:42PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Darrick J. Wong > >> <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:57:56AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > >> >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> > copy_file_range syscall returns -EXDEV if src and dest > >> >> > file are not on the same file system. > >> >> > The vfs_copy_file_range() helper, however, knows how to copy > >> >> > across file systems with do_splice_direct(). > >> >> > > >> >> > Move the enforcement of same file system from the vfs helper > >> >> > to the syscall code. > >> >> > > >> >> > A following patch is going to use the vfs_copy_file_range() > >> >> > helper in overlayfs to copy up between lower and upper > >> >> > not on the same file system. > >> >> > > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> > >> >> > --- > >> >> > fs/read_write.c | 16 +++++++++++----- > >> >> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > >> >> > > >> >> > diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c > >> >> > index 9dc6e52..6975fe8 100644 > >> >> > --- a/fs/read_write.c > >> >> > +++ b/fs/read_write.c > >> >> > @@ -1502,10 +1502,6 @@ ssize_t vfs_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, > >> >> > (file_out->f_flags & O_APPEND)) > >> >> > return -EBADF; > >> >> > > >> >> > - /* this could be relaxed once a method supports cross-fs copies */ > >> >> > - if (inode_in->i_sb != inode_out->i_sb) > >> >> > - return -EXDEV; > >> >> > - > >> >> > if (len == 0) > >> >> > return 0; > >> >> > > >> >> > @@ -1514,7 +1510,9 @@ ssize_t vfs_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, > >> >> > return ret; > >> >> > > >> >> > ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; > >> >> > - if (file_out->f_op->copy_file_range) > >> >> > + /* copy_file_range() method does not support cross-fs copies */ > >> >> > + if (inode_in->i_sb == inode_out->i_sb && > >> >> > + file_out->f_op->copy_file_range) > >> >> > ret = file_out->f_op->copy_file_range(file_in, pos_in, file_out, > >> >> > pos_out, len, flags); > >> >> > if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) > >> >> > @@ -1569,6 +1567,14 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(copy_file_range, int, fd_in, loff_t __user *, off_in, > >> >> > pos_out = f_out.file->f_pos; > >> >> > } > >> >> > > >> >> > + /* > >> >> > + * vfs_copy_file_range() can do cross-fs copy, but we want to > >> >> > + * fulfill the guaranty to userland that copy_file_range syscall > >> >> > + * does not allow cross-fs copy > >> >> > + */ > >> >> > + if (file_inode(f_in.file)->i_sb != file_inode(f_out.file)->i_sb) > >> >> > + return -EXDEV; > >> >> > >> >> Oops, that was supposed to be goto out; > >> >> Anyway, I am holding back on the vfs_copy_file_range() patches sub set > >> >> until I have a reliable test on xfs to fall back from clone to copy range > >> > > >> > Ok, attached are two rough patches -- one to add the error injection point > >> > into the kernel, and a second one to add it to the xfs_io 'inject' command. > >> > Note that you'll have to format the XFS filesystem with rmapbt=1 since we > >> > can't otherwise avoid per-AG ENOSPC if rmap is enabled. > >> > > >> > The relevant xfstests commands are: > >> > > >> > _require_xfs_io_error_injection "ag_resv_critical" > >> > _scratch_inject_error "ag_resv_critical" > >> > > >> > See the xfs/325 test for a rough framework. I'll work on cleaning up the > >> > patches and trying to get them into 4.9. > >> > > >> > >> Thanks, Darrick, but I'm not sure that's enough. does the framework allow > >> to inject an error for a specific AG? otherwise, the code will not > >> fall back from > >> failing full reflink to partial copy partial reflink. > > > > The error injector (as far as I know) cannot inject errors only for a > > specific AG. However, since your goal is to have the reflink partially > > succeed, I could set up the injector to fail only a fraction of the > > time. The difficulty here is that what we /probably/ need is to have it > > ENOSPC after N extents, where 0 < N <= nr_file_extents. Tricky since > > the probabilistic nature means that it could inject during the first > > XFS_TEST_ERROR call. > > > > Or change the function such that the error injector function only gets > > called if the file offset > 0. Then you can prepare a specially crafted > > file such that you'll always get at least a partial reflink before > > ENOSPC. Note that the reflink functions won't return where an error > > happened, so you'll end up recopying the entire range regardless. > > > > All right. How about the realtime AG. Does it support reflink? Not at this time, and probably never. > Can a file have extents both in realtime AG and other AGs? Yes -- data extents on the rt device and extended attr extents on the regular data device. The only thing you can reflink are file data extents on the data device. Everything else (attr blocks, directories, metadata) cannot be shared, just like in pre-reflink XFS. --D -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
