On 08/10/2016 08:32 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Okay, I just merged these patches into selinux#next. With the >>> exception of some changes to restore the mode argument to >>> ovl_create_or_link() and to fix some whitespace damage the patches >>> were merged cleanly. >> Don't need to add the back the mode argument, just use stat->mode. > Thanks for the pointer (I'm on vacation at the moment and trying to do > this quickly). Since it was a merge issue, and the branch hasn't been > pulled by Linus, I didn't bother with a new patch, I simply updated > the existing patch from Vivek and re-pushed to selinux#next. If you > see anything else, please let me know. > > For Fedora folks, I'm currently rebuilding the COPR > pcmoore/kernel-secnext kernel packages with this update; assuming > there are no problems with the COPR infrastructure the kernel should > be ready in a couple of hours. > > * https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pcmoore/kernel-secnext > Cool once there is a kernel with ovlerlay fs/selinux support I will run it on my laptop and attempt the selinux test suite, if everything goes well I will start running docker on overlay with selinux enforcing mode. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
