On 5/30/16, Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> On 5/30/16, Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> This is version 3 of the xattr inode operation removal patch series. The >>> patches are available in git form at: >>> >>> >>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/agruen/linux.git/log/?h=work.xattr > [...] >>> >> Hi, >> >> I pulled in agruen/linux.git#work.xattr on top of Linux v4.7-rc1 and >> noticed... >> >> 92 files changed, 563 insertions(+), 703 deletions(-) >> >> So this is on top of Linux v4.7-rc1+? > > Well, I've actually rebased the patches on top of commit b02b1fbd > which is the current mainline and one merge after v4.7-rc1, but the > few scsi commits in between -rc1 and b02b1fbd are completely > unrelated. You can easily see that in git. > I have seen the scsi changes when I ran my script which generates a patchset where latest "git-tag in Linus tree" is the base, here v4.7-rc1. >> I am here on Ubuntu/precise AMD64 realized as a WUBI-installation. >> So I use fuse, loop-device and ext4-fs. >> >> Not sure, how to test your patchset. >> Can you give some instructions on a testcase/usecase? > > The patches potentially affect xattrs and anthing that's xattr based, > like POSIX ACLs, SELinux, and Smack. There are some POSX ACL tests in > xfstests. The basic xattr functionality can of course be checked with > getfattr / setfattr. Other than that, I can probably only refer you to > the code itself. > Here I have LTP v20160126 installed. # cat /opt/ltp/Version 20160126 I ran acl_test01 (which I hacked a bit)... # LC_ALL=C ./runltp -s acl_test01 | tee acl_test01.log # cat results/LTP_RUN_ON-2016_05_30-14h_52m_29s.log Test Start Time: Mon May 30 14:52:30 2016 ----------------------------------------- Testcase Result Exit Value -------- ------ ---------- acl_test01 PASS 0 ----------------------------------------------- Total Tests: 1 Total Skipped Tests: 0 Total Failures: 0 Kernel Version: 4.7.0-rc1-2-iniza-small Machine Architecture: x86_64 Hostname: fambox ...and it looks good. >> Booting into a kernel with your patchset looks fine to me - on the 1st >> sight. > > Okay, thanks. > Cannot say if this helps you. - Sedat - P.S.: Hacking acl_test01 # diff -uprN ./testcases/bin/acl_test01.orig ./testcases/bin/acl_test01 --- ./testcases/bin/acl_test01.orig 2016-03-27 21:45:00.768007420 +0200 +++ ./testcases/bin/acl_test01 2016-05-30 14:41:50.195986299 +0200 @@ -41,8 +41,6 @@ export TCID=acltest01 export TST_TOTAL=5 export TST_COUNT=1 -. test.sh - TMP=${TMP:=/tmp} TEST_USER1="acltest1" @@ -54,6 +52,8 @@ FILE_ACL="$TMP/tacl/mount-ext3/test_file FILE_ACL_LINK="$TMP/tacl/mount-ext3/test_file_link" TCbin=`pwd` +. $TCbin/test.sh + COMMAND=$(command -v "getenforce" "setenforce" |wc -l) if [ $COMMAND -eq 2 ]; then SELINUX=$(getenforce) - EOT -
Attachment:
acl_test01.log
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
LTP_RUN_ON-2016_05_30-14h_52m_29s.log
Description: Binary data
