On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 05:01:23PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > But it does take care of the majority of f_path users that actually want the > covering path. Bloody bad idea, IMO. I have no objections against adding _helpers_ from that patch (seq_file_path(), etc.), but I really don't like adding that second struct path there. And it still doesn't fix the issue with LSM, etc., so we'll _still_ need to fix it sane way. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
