RE: `fungraph_entry` and `funcgraph_exit` entries: is there a mismatch between trace-cmd and the format of debugfs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear community,
My problem was a bad understanding of the `type_len` field of the event header.
You can ignore this mail, sorry.
Bests,
Matteo

-----Original Message-----
From: Matteo Bertolino 
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 11:20 AM
To: 'linux-trace-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <linux-trace-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: `fungraph_entry` and `funcgraph_exit` entries: is there a mismatch between trace-cmd and the format of debugfs?

Dear Community,

I would like to share with you something interesting came out from one of my tests. 

I am manually  writing a binary trace composed of `funcgraph_entry` and `funcgraph_exit` entries: 
This is an example:
CPU0: Task A entry ------- Task B entry  ------- Task B exit ------- Task A exit.

After writing the trace, I display it with Kernelshark.

Both entries and exit give me problems. Let's start with the entry.

I gave to the section 17 of the trace.dat the following file:
````
name: funcgraph_entry
ID: 11
format:
	field:unsigned short common_type;	offset:0;	size:2;	signed:0;
	field:unsigned char common_flags;	offset:2;	size:1;	signed:0;
	field:unsigned char common_preempt_count;	offset:3;	size:1;	signed:0;
	field:int common_pid;	offset:4;	size:4;	signed:1;
	field:unsigned long func;	offset:8;	size:8;	signed:0;
	field:int depth;	offset:16;	size:4;	signed:1;

print fmt: "--> %ps (%d)", (void *)REC->func, REC->depth ````

So, in the trace, after the event header, I write 2 bytes for the ID (11 in this case), 1 for the flags, and so and so, until the last one: 4 bytes for depth.
The problem arrives there: if I don't write 4 additional bytes on field `depth` (or 4 additional bytes of padding), the next entry is not displayed on Kernelshark, which shows an [UNKNOWN EVENT[.

A little hypothesis: I noticed that `fgraph_ent_handler()` function on `trace-ftrace.c` calls `print_graph_nested()`. The latter declares `depth` as `unsigned long long depth;`  , namely on 8 bytes instead of the declared 4.

If I modify the file in this way (below) and, for each `funcgraph_entry` entry, I write the depth 8 bytes instead of 4, everything is ok:
````
name: funcgraph_entry
ID: 11
format:
	field:unsigned short common_type;	offset:0;	size:2;	signed:0;
	field:unsigned char common_flags;	offset:2;	size:1;	signed:0;
	field:unsigned char common_preempt_count;	offset:3;	size:1;	signed:0;
	field:int common_pid;	offset:4;	size:4;	signed:1;
	field:unsigned long func;	offset:8;	size:8;	signed:0;
	field:int depth;	offset:16;	size:8;	signed:1;

print fmt: "--> %ps (%d)", (void *)REC->func, REC->depth ````

Now, unfortunately, I have the same problem with `funcgraph_exit` entries, but this this I cannot find a workaround.
The first `funcgraph_exit` entry that I write is perfectly displayed on Kernelshark, but everything subsequent to it is broken.

Example of `funcgraph_exit` entry:
4 bytes of TS delta
2 bytes for the ID (11)
1 byte for common_flags, I don't use this field, so I wrote the value 0.
1 byte for common_preempt_count, I don't use this field, so I wrote the value 0.
4 bytes of PID
8 bytes of func field
4 bytes of depth (here, I left this on 4 bytes)
4 bytes of overrun, I don't use this field, so I wrote value 0.
8 bytes for calltime
8 bytes for rettime.

My questions are:
1- Do you think that my fix for `funcgraph_entry` entry's depth value is correct?
2- If so, can we have a double check on the `funcgraph_exit` entry as well?

Cheers,
Matteo



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux