On 11/15/2010 07:11 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 19:09 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > trace-cmd doesn't like trace_printk(): > > <...>-23775 [000] 26343.288803: kvm_emulate_insn: 0:f14e9: rep insb > <...>-23775 [000] 26343.288804: bprint: x86_emulate_insn : > (NO FORMAT FOUND at ffffffffa0131460) > > <...>-23775 [000] 26343.288807: bprint: x86_emulate_insn : > (NO FORMAT FOUND at ffffffffa0131460) > > any chance to get it to work with custom printks? > > I guess I should use 'perf probe' instead. > Which kernel are you using, and/or which trace-cmd? It works fine for me. But there has been bugs with older kernels and older trace-cmds.
kernel 2.6.37-rc1+, I think latest trace-cmd; will retry. Meanwhile 'perf probe' grumbles on anonymous unions:
src(tyep:operand) has no member val. Failed to find 'ctxt' in this function. Error: Failed to add events. (-22)
For--add 'insb=arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:3369 insn=ctxt->decode.b bytes=ctxt->decode.dst.bytes port=ctxt->decode.src.val cx=ctxt->decode.regs[1] di=ctxt->decode.regs[7] addr=ctxt->decode.dst.mem.addr cpos=ctxt->decode.io_read.pos cend=ctxt->decode.io_read.end'
(ctxt->decode.src.val is a member of an anonymous union in ctxt->decode.src, which is of type 'struct operand')
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-trace-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|