On 10/26/2010 8:32 AM, Pierre Tardy wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Ingo Molnar<mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:How will future PCI (or other device) power saving tracepoints be called? Might be more consistent to use: power:cpu_idle power:machine_idle power:device_idleAgree with this. FYI, I have a runtime_pm tracepoint currently cooking. Here is preliminary patch. Can this be a candidate for a "power:device_idle" tracepoint?
I would like to see a slightly more advanced tracepoint do the runtime pm framework; specifically I'd like to see the "comm" of the process that's taking a refcount on a device
(that way, powertop can track which process keeps a device busy) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-trace-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html