Re: PATCH [0/4] perf: clean-up of power events API

[Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thomas,

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thursday 07 October 2010 17:08:25 Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> [ Adding a few more CCs, since this discussion is about a tracepoint
>>   userspace ABI policy, which is a topic of general interest. ]
>>
> ...
>> Yes, sadly this debate running in circles hurts contributors.
>>
>> Thanks for the summary!
> Thanks for yours!
>
> So you (and Peter Zijlstra and some others) prefer the solution I
> posted with these two patches:
> [PATCH 1/2] PERF(kernel): Cleanup power events
My latest patch [1/4] is a rework of your patch. It adds:
- adaptation to linux-2.6-tip
- change of a wrong permission intel_idle.c
- light changes in the API (correction of trace printks ...)

I would prefer to use that version if you are ok.

> [PATCH 2/2] PERF(userspace): Adjust perf timechart to the new power events
>
> Those should be fine.
> Ingo, can you merge them, so that Jean can finally put his ARM
> specific implementation on top.
>
> Thanks,
>
>    Thomas
>

Jean
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-trace-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html