Re: [PATCH 29/38] trace-cmd record: prevent memory leak in setup_network()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed,  5 Jun 2024 15:40:44 +0200
"Jerome Marchand" <jmarchan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Because of the again label, msg_handle can be already allocated if we
> exit after we got a negative socket file descriptor. Free it there.
> 
> Fixes a RESOURCE_LEAK error (CWE-772)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tracecmd/trace-record.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tracecmd/trace-record.c b/tracecmd/trace-record.c
> index b4cbd438..770e775b 100644
> --- a/tracecmd/trace-record.c
> +++ b/tracecmd/trace-record.c
> @@ -3903,6 +3903,7 @@ static struct tracecmd_msg_handle *setup_network(struct buffer_instance *instanc
>  
>  	if (sfd < 0) {
>  		free(thost);
> +		free(msg_handle);

As msg_handle is created with:

	msg_handle = tracecmd_msg_handle_alloc(sfd, 0);

This should be:

	trace_msg_handle_close(msg_handle);

But may require:

			close(sfd);
+			msg_handle->fd = -1;
			free(host);
			host = NULL;
			goto again;

I'll skip this patch.

-- Steve


>  		return NULL;
>  	}
>  





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux