Re: [PATCH] eventfs: Have inodes have unique inode numbers
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] eventfs: Have inodes have unique inode numbers
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 14:29:01 -0800
- Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Trace Devel <linux-trace-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ajay Kaher <ajay.kaher@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <8547159a-0b28-4d75-af02-47fc450785fa@efficios.com>
- References: <20240126150209.367ff402@gandalf.local.home> <CAHk-=wgZEHwFRgp2Q8_-OtpCtobbuFPBmPTZ68qN3MitU-ub=Q@mail.gmail.com> <20240126162626.31d90da9@gandalf.local.home> <CAHk-=wj8WygQNgoHerp-aKyCwFxHeyKMguQszVKyJfi-=Yfadw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHk-=whNfNti-mn6vhL-v-WZnn0i7ZAbwSf_wNULJeyanhPOgg@mail.gmail.com> <8547159a-0b28-4d75-af02-47fc450785fa@efficios.com>
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 at 14:14, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I do however have a concern with the approach of using the same
> inode number for various files on the same filesystem: AFAIU it
> breaks userspace ABI expectations.
Virtual filesystems have always done that in various ways.
Look at the whole discussion about the size of the file. Then look at /proc.
And honestly, eventfs needs to be simplified. It's a mess. It's less
of a mess than it used to be, but people should *NOT* think that it's
a real filesystem.
Don't use some POSIX standard as an expectation for things like /proc,
/sys or tracefs.
Linus
[Index of Archives]
[Linux USB Development]
[Linux USB Development]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite Hiking]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]