Hello Steven, On 1/12/24 16:37, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:39:42 +0100 Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@xxxxxxx> wrote:Update usage for 'trace-cmd split' command.I mentioned in my reply to the cover letter about the subject, but also having more detail in the change log is good. What was missing from the usage that needed to be fixed?
The patch just intended to add available parameters that were missing from the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@xxxxxxx> --- tracecmd/trace-split.c | 21 +++++++++++++-------- tracecmd/trace-usage.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/tracecmd/trace-split.c b/tracecmd/trace-split.c index 6ccda2fc..b6c056b5 100644 --- a/tracecmd/trace-split.c +++ b/tracecmd/trace-split.c @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static int parse_cpu(struct tracecmd_input *handle, unsigned long long start, unsigned long long end, int count_limit, int percpu, int cpu, - enum split_types type) + enum split_types type, bool *end_reached) { struct tep_record *record; struct tep_handle *pevent; @@ -325,6 +325,9 @@ static int parse_cpu(struct tracecmd_input *handle, } }+ if (record && (record->ts > end))+ *end_reached = true; + if (record) tracecmd_free_record(record);@@ -352,7 +355,8 @@ static unsigned long long parse_file(struct tracecmd_input *handle,unsigned long long start, unsigned long long end, int percpu, int only_cpu, int count, - enum split_types type) + enum split_types type, + bool *end_reached) { unsigned long long current; struct tracecmd_output *ohandle; @@ -396,14 +400,14 @@ static unsigned long long parse_file(struct tracecmd_input *handle,if (only_cpu >= 0) {parse_cpu(handle, cpu_data, start, end, count, - 1, only_cpu, type); + 1, only_cpu, type, end_reached); } else if (percpu) { for (cpu = 0; cpu < cpus; cpu++) parse_cpu(handle, cpu_data, start, - end, count, percpu, cpu, type); + end, count, percpu, cpu, type, end_reached); } else parse_cpu(handle, cpu_data, start, - end, count, percpu, -1, type); + end, count, percpu, -1, type, end_reached);cpu_list = malloc(sizeof(*cpu_list) * cpus);if (!cpu_list) @@ -415,7 +419,6 @@ static unsigned long long parse_file(struct tracecmd_input *handle, if (tracecmd_append_cpu_data(ohandle, cpus, cpu_list) < 0) die("Failed to append tracing data\n");- current = end;for (cpu = 0; cpu < cpus; cpu++) { /* Set the tracecmd cursor to the next set of records */ if (cpu_data[cpu].offset) { @@ -440,6 +443,7 @@ void trace_split (int argc, char **argv) struct tracecmd_input *handle; unsigned long long start_ns = 0, end_ns = 0; unsigned long long current; + bool end_reached = false; double start, end; char *endptr; char *output = NULL; @@ -564,11 +568,12 @@ void trace_split (int argc, char **argv) strcpy(output_file, output); current = parse_file(handle, output_file, start_ns, end_ns, - percpu, cpu, count, type); + percpu, cpu, count, type, &end_reached); + if (!repeat) break; start_ns = 0; - } while (current && (!end_ns || current < end_ns)); + } while (!end_reached && (current && (!end_ns || current < end_ns)));free(output);free(output_file);The above looks like it has nothing to do with the usage, and was perhaps accidentally merged in this patch?
Yes right, something wrong happened while rebasing, sorry for that...
-- Stevediff --git a/tracecmd/trace-usage.c b/tracecmd/trace-usage.c index 61acce5f..433928d3 100644 --- a/tracecmd/trace-usage.c +++ b/tracecmd/trace-usage.c @@ -303,13 +303,14 @@ static struct usage_help usage_help[] = { { "split", "parse a trace.dat file into smaller file(s)", - " %s split [options] -o file [start [end]]\n" + " %s split [-i file] [options] -o file [start [end]]\n" " -o output file to write to (file.1, file.2, etc)\n" " -s n split file up by n seconds\n" " -m n split file up by n milliseconds\n" " -u n split file up by n microseconds\n" " -e n split file up by n events\n" " -p n split file up by n pages\n" + " -C n select CPU n\n" " -r repeat from start to end\n" " -c per cpu, that is -p 2 will be 2 pages for each CPU\n" " if option is specified, it will split the file\n"
|