On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 08:56:54 -0600 Ross Zwisler <zwisler@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Probably need to also s/type/val_name/g for the traceeval_stat() macro so they > stay in sync, and need to update the calls to traceeval_iterator_stat() and Makes sense. > traceeval_stat() in samples/task-eval.c so they continue to work. Ah, I had that as a separate patch (never sent it). But it makes more sense to just fold it into this one. -- Steve
|