On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 3:44 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 15:18:11 +0300 > "Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware)" <tz.stoyanov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The enable_trace_eprobe() function enables all event probes, attached > > to given trace probe. If an error occurs in enabling one of the event > > probes, all others should be roll backed. There is a bug in that roll > > back logic - instead of all event probes, only the failed one is > > disabled. > > > > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Fixes: 7491e2c44278 ("tracing: Add a probe that attaches to trace events") > > Signed-off-by: Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware) <tz.stoyanov@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c | 8 ++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c > > index 67e854979d53..ba9a28bc773f 100644 > > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c > > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c > > @@ -702,8 +702,12 @@ static int enable_trace_eprobe(struct trace_event_call *call, > > > > if (ret) { > > /* Failed to enable one of them. Roll back all */ > > - if (enabled) > > - disable_eprobe(ep, file->tr); > > + if (enabled) { > > If one was enabled and the second one failed, that should only happen > if there's a bug in the kernel (unless the failure was due to a memory > problem). > > I wonder if we should add: > > int cnt = 0; > > > + list_for_each_entry(pos, trace_probe_probe_list(tp), list) { > > /* > * It's a bug if one failed for something other than memory > * not being available but another eprobe succeeded. > */ > WARN_ON_ONCE(cnt++ && ret != -ENOMEM); That makes sense, I can send v2 with it. What is the idea of this cnt counter, why not just: WARN_ON_ONCE(ret != -ENOMEM); outside of the loop? If enabled is true and ret is not ENOMEM, the bug is already there. > > -- Steve > > > > + ep = container_of(pos, struct trace_eprobe, tp); > > + disable_eprobe(ep, file->tr); > > + } > > + } > > if (file) > > trace_probe_remove_file(tp, file); > > else > -- Tzvetomir (Ceco) Stoyanov VMware Open Source Technology Center