From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> The man page for tracefs_kprobe_alloc() states that it does not create a kprobe in the system, but fails to state how one should be created. Add a comment that informs the reader that the returned descriptor can be passed to tracefs_dynevent_create() to create it in the system. Reported-by: Stevie Alvarez <steviea@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- Documentation/libtracefs-kprobes.txt | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/libtracefs-kprobes.txt b/Documentation/libtracefs-kprobes.txt index f03b096778a5..199379ade7f7 100644 --- a/Documentation/libtracefs-kprobes.txt +++ b/Documentation/libtracefs-kprobes.txt @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ int *tracefs_kprobe_destroy*(const char pass:[*]_system_, const char pass:[*]_ev DESCRIPTION ----------- *tracefs_kprobe_alloc*() allocates a new kprobe context. The kbrobe is not configured in the system. +The kprobe can be added to the system by passing in the returned descriptor into +*tracefs_dynevent_create(3)*. The new kprobe will be in the _system_ group (or kprobes if _system_ is NULL) and have the name of _event_ (or _addr_ if _event_ is NULL). The kprobe will be inserted to _addr_ (function name, with or without offset, or a address), and the _format_ will define the format of the kprobe. See the -- 2.39.2