-- Observed in, but not limited to, Linux 6.1.1 Dear all, rtla osnoise hist always outputs '0' as average duration value. Example: # rtla osnoise hist -P F:1 -c 0-1 -r 900000 -d 1M -b 1 -E 5000 -T 1 # RTLA osnoise histogram # Time unit is microseconds (us) # Duration: 0 00:01:00 ... count: 5629 1364 min: 1 1 avg: 0 0 max: 2955 56This is due to sum_sample in osnoise_hist_update_multiple() being calculated as the sum (duration), not as sum (duration * count).
Rounding, instead of truncating, of the average value would be cool. The following patch would solve the issue described above: Sampled duration must be weighted by observed quantity, to arrive at a correct average duration value. Fix calculation of total duration by summing (duration * count). Introduce rounding for calculation of final value. Signed-off-by: Andreas Ziegler <br015@xxxxxxxxxx> --- a/tools/tracing/rtla/src/osnoise_hist.c +++ b/tools/tracing/rtla/src/osnoise_hist.c @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ { struct osnoise_hist_params *params = tool->params; struct osnoise_hist_data *data = tool->data; + unsigned long long total_duration; int entries = data->entries; int bucket; int *hist; @@ -131,10 +132,12 @@ if (data->bucket_size) bucket = duration / data->bucket_size; + total_duration = duration * count; + hist = data->hist[cpu].samples; data->hist[cpu].count += count; update_min(&data->hist[cpu].min_sample, &duration); - update_sum(&data->hist[cpu].sum_sample, &duration); + update_sum(&data->hist[cpu].sum_sample, &total_duration); update_max(&data->hist[cpu].max_sample, &duration); if (bucket < entries) @@ -333,7 +336,7 @@ if (data->hist[cpu].count) trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, "%9llu ", - data->hist[cpu].sum_sample / data->hist[cpu].count);+ (data->hist[cpu].sum_sample + data->hist[cpu].count / 2) / data->hist[cpu].count);
else trace_seq_printf(trace->seq, " - "); } Kind regards, Andreas