Re: [PATCH] [BACKPORT FOR 4.14] libtraceevent: Fix build with binutils 2.35
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] [BACKPORT FOR 4.14] libtraceevent: Fix build with binutils 2.35
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 15:33:24 +0000
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- Cc: "stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-trace-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-trace-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@xxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20221213202535.GL25951@gate.crashing.org>
- References: <c4629a12d4a2a21ff131624d3ef1d9f8b5fd64ad.1670954579.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> <20221213202535.GL25951@gate.crashing.org>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0
Le 13/12/2022 à 21:25, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 07:03:07PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> In binutils 2.35, 'nm -D' changed to show symbol versions along with
>> symbol names, with the usual @@ separator.
>
> 2.37 instead? And --without-symbol-versions is there to restore the
> old behaviour. The script is parsing the output already so this patch
> is simpler maybe, but :-)
>
Do you mean that the original commit from Ben should have done it
differently ?
My patch is only a backport of original commit 39efdd94e314
("libtraceevent: Fix build with binutils 2.35") due to Makefile being at
a different place in 4.14.
Christophe
[Index of Archives]
[Linux USB Development]
[Linux USB Development]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite Hiking]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]