Hi folks, While discussing around [1], Steve had the idea [2] of creating a "proper" type for cpumask event fields so that userspace tooling doesn't have to guess whether an unsigned long [] is meant to be a cpumask or not. o Patch 1 is a collateral fix found by running the new units tests. o Patch 2 introduces a small amount of boiler plate to get cpumask fields on the same level as bitmask fields o Patch 3 adds pretty-print output for cpumasks o Patch 4 is unit tests for the above Cheers, Valentin Revisions ========= v2 -> v3 ++++++++ o Rebased on top of latest libtraceevent o Added unit tests (Steven) o Moved TEP_PRINT_CPUMASK definition to the tail of tep_print_arg_type (Steven) v1 -> v2 ++++++++ o Rebased on top of latest libtraceevent o Fixed s/__get_cpumask/__get_rel_cpumask/ typo [1]: http://lore.kernel.org/r/xhsmhilkqfi7z.mognet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [2]: http://lore.kernel.org/r/20221014080456.1d32b989@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Valentin Schneider (4): libtraceevent: Ensure print_field_raw() terminates with '\0' libtraceevent: Add boiler-plate code for cpumask types libtraceevent: Pretty-print cpumask fields as a cpulist libtraceevent: Add unit tests for cpumask processing include/traceevent/event-parse.h | 1 + src/event-parse.c | 191 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ utest/traceevent-utest.c | 161 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 353 insertions(+) -- 2.31.1
|