Re: [PATCH V4 02/19] trace/osnoise: Split workload start from the tracer start
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 02/19] trace/osnoise: Split workload start from the tracer start
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 22:25:17 -0400
- Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tom Zanussi <zanussi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx>, Clark Williams <williams@xxxxxxxxxx>, John Kacur <jkacur@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-rt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-trace-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <90bfad2bdd348f85b1ff473077de676f75ab445c.1634820694.git.bristot@kernel.org>
- References: <cover.1634820694.git.bristot@kernel.org> <90bfad2bdd348f85b1ff473077de676f75ab445c.1634820694.git.bristot@kernel.org>
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 14:56:40 +0200
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +/*
> + * osnoise_workload_stop - stop the workload and unhook the events
> + */
> +static void osnoise_workload_stop(void)
> +{
> + if (!osnoise_busy)
> + return;
> +
> + trace_osnoise_callback_enabled = false;
I know this is just moving this code, but the original code had this
issue too, but there should be a comment here to why we need the
compiler barrier.
-- Steve
> + barrier();
> +
> + stop_per_cpu_kthreads();
> +
> + unhook_irq_events();
> + unhook_softirq_events();
> + unhook_thread_events();
> +
> + osnoise_busy = false;
> +}
> +
[Index of Archives]
[Linux USB Development]
[Linux USB Development]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite Hiking]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]