On Tue, 14 Sep 2021 16:12:26 +0300 "Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware)" <tz.stoyanov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This clean up is needed for the design of the next trace file version, > where only CPUs with trace data could be stored in the file. Each trace > instance may have its own CPU count, depending on collected traces. > As the main input handler is used by the top trace instance, the > CPU count there is for the top trace instance and may differ with cpu > counts of the other instances. Added a new "max_cpu" member of the input > handler, that tracks the maximum CPU count of all instances, recorded in > the file. > > Signed-off-by: Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware) <tz.stoyanov@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > lib/trace-cmd/trace-input.c | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/lib/trace-cmd/trace-input.c b/lib/trace-cmd/trace-input.c > index cb8b9f14..dc82d3ea 100644 > --- a/lib/trace-cmd/trace-input.c > +++ b/lib/trace-cmd/trace-input.c > @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ struct tracecmd_input { > int long_size; > int page_size; > int page_map_size; > + int max_cpu; > int cpus; > int ref; > int nr_buffers; /* buffer instances */ > @@ -838,6 +839,7 @@ static int read_cpus(struct tracecmd_input *handle) > return -1; > > handle->cpus = cpus; > + handle->max_cpu = cpus; > tep_set_cpus(handle->pevent, handle->cpus); > handle->file_state = TRACECMD_FILE_CPU_COUNT; > > @@ -2794,6 +2796,8 @@ static int handle_options(struct tracecmd_input *handle) > case TRACECMD_OPTION_CPUCOUNT: > cpus = *(int *)buf; > handle->cpus = tep_read_number(handle->pevent, &cpus, 4); > + handle->max_cpu = handle->cpus; Shouldn't this be: if (handles->cpus > handle->max_cpu) handle->max_cpu = handle->cpus; ?? -- Steve > + tep_set_cpus(handle->pevent, handle->cpus); > break; > case TRACECMD_OPTION_PROCMAPS: > if (buf[size-1] == '\0') > @@ -4074,7 +4078,7 @@ int tracecmd_page_size(struct tracecmd_input *handle) > */ > int tracecmd_cpus(struct tracecmd_input *handle) > { > - return handle->cpus; > + return handle->max_cpu; > } > > /**