On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:02:25 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:27:35 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I like to prohibit latter one. It is my feeling, but I think it is > > natural that the eprobe is only for the static events, and I also think > > dereferencing a pointer-type field in raw-event is more reliable than > > dereferencing a digit value passed to the synthetic event. > > Although I believe we need to attach eprobes to synthetic events, for > the reasons I stated in my previous email. I'm perfectly happy to > forbid them from attaching to kprobe or uprobe events. Because, > honestly, eprobes do not give you anything that a kprobe nor uprobe can > give you. Agreed. It is meaningless to put eprobes on kprobes or uprobes. Thank you, > > -- Steve -- Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
|