Re: [PATCH 0/7] libtracfes: Add tracefs_function_filter()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 23/03/21 6:22 pm, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 21:27:55 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This adds a new API tracefs_function_filter() as described in:

  https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210643

It will use regular expressions against available_filter_functions (or even
the kernel glob expression) to enable the function by the index method if it
is supported. If it is not supported, it will go back to the writing of the
filter strings directly into the set_ftrace_filter file.


Playing with the interface some more, I feel it's not quite adequate.

The returning the negative number of filters that failed, isn't very
useful. Having the errs array that points to those filters gives us that
information.
Yeah, Anyway we are pointing the failed filters using the errs pointer. But to differentiate

the failed filters from the general errors, we can return -1, what you say?

Also, because of the way that file works in the kernel, we need to be able
to call this function several times without closing the file. That's
because the actions take place when the file is closed, *not* when a write
is made. Having the interface return errors without closing the file would
allow the user to fix the failed filters and try again.

I plan on committing this patch series, so any new changes will be done on
top of them. But here's what I think needs to be done to make the interface
more usable.

  - Create a tracefs_function_filter_commit(instance) API that will close
    the file and commit the changes.

  - Have the tracefs_function_filter() open the set_ftrace_filter file if it
    is not already opened. This will allow for the function to be called
    multiple times. The file descriptor will be part of the instance
    descriptor or a global variable for the top level instance. The opening
    of the files will need to be protected by a pthread mutex.
    Note, the "reset" parameter is only applicable if the file is not
    already opened.

  - On success, return 0 and tracefs_function_filter_commit() must be called.

  - If the file descriptor is opened and an error happens, return 1, and the
    tracefs_function_filter_commit() still needs to be called, but the user
    can call tracefs_function_filter() again to try to fix the problem.

  - If an error is found before the file descriptor is opened, then
    tracefs_function_filter_commit() does not need to be called.

That is:

	ret = tracefs_function_filter(...);
	if (ret >= 0)
		tracefs_function_filter_commit();

  - Now for errs, it will be allocated if a problem happened on a filter,
    and may be set if the return value is non zero (1 or -1). The user can
    use it to know if the problem happened on a filter as well as find out
    which filter had the problem.

  - We can have a tracefs_read_function_filter() that returns an array of
    strings which ends with a NULL pointer (and needs to be freed with
    tracefs_list_free(), and have this:

    save_filters = tracefs_read_function_filter(instance);

    ret = tracefs_function_filter(instance, filters, NULL, true, &errs);
    if (ret > 0 && errs) {
	/* Modified but failed */
	int i, j;
	for (i = 0; filters[i]; i++)
		;
	for (j = 0; errs[i]; j++)
		;
	if (i == j)
		/* all filters failed! Put back the original */
		tracefs_function_filter(instance, save_filters, NULL, false, NULL);
    }
    if (ret >= 0)
	tracefs_function_filter_commit(instance);

Another reason to have it not close the file is because we only support
passing in one module at a time. If the user wants to enable functions in
two modules, they would need to call this twice, and we want them to be
able to do so and have both changes take affect at the same time.

Thoughts?

-- Steve



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux