On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 11:06:16 +0800 Zamir SUN <sztsian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 3:17 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > [ Removing the powertop mailing list because it's rejecting everything ] > > > > On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:41:20 -0700 > > Tony Jones <tonyj@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:19:50AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > > > Once it's shown that it works for all the package maintainers, I will tag > > > > it which should create the tarballs automatically on the above link. > > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > It builds fine for me after manually creating the tarball from git. > > > Once there is an official versioned tarball I'll push it into > > > openSUSE. > > > > > > I presume some perf Makefile changes will be forthcoming to use it, > > > rather than continuing to force build it out of TRACE_EVENT_DIR > > > > > > > Zamir found this issue with the Documentation man pages: > > > > Note, I'm not sure the proper way to fix this. I think this is the last > > issue I need to resolve before making the tag. > > > > If anyone interested in, the discussion of this document compiling is > in the thread "libtraceevent: make doc-install tries different file > names than generated". > > With the patch Steve mentioned, I can package this in RPM already. And > it's pending review in Fedora now. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887470 > > So, for me, there is no more issue for Fedora packaging. > So should I just add that one patch and tag it? -- Steve
|