Re: Where is proper libtraceevent plugins tree?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 00:09:04 +0300
Vitaly Chikunov <vt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Steven,
> 
> I am trying to rework trace-cmd and perf packages for ALT Linux. But, I
> found that trace-cmd 2.9 builds and installs /usr/lib64/traceevent/plugins
> and perf builds and installs /usr/lib64/traceevent/plugins (some plugins
> have same names, some different).
> 
> This would create bad files conflict in packaging system.
> 
> Both source trees seems to be recently updated:
>   linux/tools/lib/traceevent/plugins/ and
>   trace-cmd/lib/traceevent/plugins/
> 
> (trace-cmd 2.8 it installed these same plugins in /usr/lib64/trace-cmd/plugins).
> 
> How it's supposed to build and install (perf and trace-cmd) without conflicts?
> Where is true (lib?)traceevent source tree?

Actually, I'm working on making a stand alone libtraceevent, that's
going to live on kernel.org, that should be the main source. Perhaps
sometime this week I may have something working.

-- Steve



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux