Re: [PATCH v5 02/17] perf ftrace: add option '-F/--funcs' to list available functions
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/17] perf ftrace: add option '-F/--funcs' to list available functions
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 12:27:40 -0400
- Cc: Changbin Du <changbin.du@xxxxxxxxx>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "linux-trace-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-trace-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20200717162116.GB712240@kernel.org>
- References: <20200711124035.6513-1-changbin.du@gmail.com> <20200711124035.6513-3-changbin.du@gmail.com> <20200717110504.1650fbdc@oasis.local.home> <20200717162116.GB712240@kernel.org>
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 13:21:16 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Would you like to start contributing to that, and when we get the
> > libtracefs.so packed in distributions, we can easily create the
> > perf ftrace without having to rewrite the wheel 10 times?
>
> Or we can use as soon as it is available, not preventing 'perf ftrace'
> from having to wait for libtracefs.so?
>
> Duplication is normal at some point, Changbin is moving 'perf ftrace'
> forward, and has been doing this thru several patch series revisions, if
> we continue putting new requirements, it gets tiresome at some point :-\
We're finally at the point to move libtracefs.so and libtraceevent.so
into their own repository.
My fear is that the two will become incompatible, and forked forever.
-- Steve
[Index of Archives]
[Linux USB Development]
[Linux USB Development]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite Hiking]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]