On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 11:57:40 +0300 "Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware)" <tz.stoyanov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Tzvetomir Stoyanov <tstoyanov@xxxxxxxxxx> > > The kbuffer_next_event() will return the next event on the sub buffer. > If we pass in the last_record to tracecmd_read_page_record(), it > initializes the sub buffer, and by calling kbuffer_next_event() > (instead of kbuffer_read_event()), the second event on the sub buffer > is returned. This causes the match of the last_record not to match if > the last_record happens to be the first event on the sub buffer. Bah, I see why this was done incorrectly. Good catch. This should be added independent of this series. Thanks! -- Steve
|