Re: [PATCH v7 resend 1/2] Provide in-kernel headers to make extending kernel easier
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 resend 1/2] Provide in-kernel headers to make extending kernel easier
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 09:30:07 +0200
- Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, atish patra <atishp04@xxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Colascione <dancol@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx>, Guenter Roeck <groeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>, Karim Yaghmour <karim.yaghmour@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-trace-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Manoj Rao <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxx>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>, Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20190429142425.GB29007@kroah.com>
- References: <20190426190430.172543-1-joel@joelfernandes.org> <20190427133844.GA29366@kroah.com> <20190429132602.GA165075@google.com> <20190429135455.GA2412@kroah.com> <CAK7LNARkGLQ_P4LSuC69QN8XPN47W5ujkDE3EauLrwnBgygsSA@mail.gmail.com> <20190429142425.GB29007@kroah.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
> > > As you say, either is fine with me.
> > >
> > > > 2. Who is going to pull this patch: This seems a matter of where the header
> > > > archive resides. If it is in /sys/kernel/ then I am assuming Greg will pull
> > > > it. Masahiro has given his Reviewed-by tag, is he the one to pull it?
> > >
> > > I can take it, but it probably should just go through the kbuild tree,
> > > as that makes more sense to me.
> >
> >
> > I do not want to take responsibility for this.
>
> Hah, ok, I'll be glad to queue this up in my tree. I'll take it now,
> and if people who really object to this being in /proc/ and want it in
> /sys/, we can add a follow-on patch before 5.2-final is out to move the
> file to that location.
People really object to having it in kernel in the first place.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[Index of Archives]
[Linux USB Development]
[Linux USB Development]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite Hiking]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]