Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] Provide in-kernel headers to make extending kernel easier
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] Provide in-kernel headers to make extending kernel easier
- From: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 18:16:19 +0200
- Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxx>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx>, Manoj Rao <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>, atish patra <atishp04@xxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Colascione <dancol@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Guenter Roeck <groeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>, Karim Yaghmour <karim.yaghmour@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-trace-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>, Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <CAK8P3a30yY_1mPcUBxOYOkbFwoeCHbo5EHuWMN4fqKug9DiQDQ@mail.gmail.com>
- Organization: metux IT consult
- References: <20190320163116.39275-1-joel@joelfernandes.org> <CAOesGMheoZda84OSz9spQ7p66wot5S_9aaqaKC=QYp+8utASXA@mail.gmail.com> <20190408203601.GF133872@google.com> <CAOesGMibHCuMPCYkc8V++Z2Kuf3YQf_OjYn18GvDgzTy6ubV=g@mail.gmail.com> <CAK8P3a30yY_1mPcUBxOYOkbFwoeCHbo5EHuWMN4fqKug9DiQDQ@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1
On 10.04.19 21:19, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> - we use cpio for initramfs because unpacking cpio in C code is
> fairly simple, while unpacking tar is not (see the wikipedia page on tar).
> If we were to unpack it from the kernel, the initramfs code could be
> trivially reused.
What about ar ? ;-)
> - nobody sane uses cpio in user space, since tar is already present
> almost everywhere, while cpio is rather obscure in comparison.
So, rpm doesn't count as "sane" ? :o
--mtx
--
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@xxxxxxxxx -- +49-151-27565287
[Index of Archives]
[Linux USB Development]
[Linux USB Development]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite Hiking]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]